Thursday, June 11, 2009
The Electron God...
"The fact that nobody’s actually seen an electron, and that trying to imagine one ties our minds in knots, has led some physicists and philosophers of science to wonder whether it’s even accurate to say that electrons do exist. You could say that with electrons, as with God, there are believers and there are skeptics.
The believers believe there’s something out there—some “thing” in some sense of the word “thing”—that corresponds to the word “electron”; and that, though the best we can do is conceive of this “thing” imperfectly, even misleadingly, conceiving of it that way makes more sense than not conceiving of it at all. They believe in electrons while professing their inability to really “know” what an electron is. You might say they believe in electrons even while lacking proof that electrons per se exist.
Many of these physicists, while holding that imperfectly conceiving subatomic reality is a valid form of knowledge, wouldn’t approve if you tried to perform a similar maneuver in a theological context. If you said you believe in God, even while acknowledging that you have no clear idea what God is—and that you can’t even really prove God per se exists—they would say your belief has no foundation.
Yet what exactly is the difference between the logic of their belief in electrons and the logic of a belief in God? They perceive patterns in the physical world—such as the behavior of electricity—and posit a source of these patterns and call that source the “electron.” A believer in God perceives patterns in the moral world (or, at least, moral patterns in the physical world) and posits a source of these patterns and calls the source “God.” “God” is that unknown thing that is the source of the moral order, the reason there is a moral dimension to life on Earth and a moral direction to time on Earth; “God” is responsible for the fact that life is sentient, capable of good and bad feelings, and hence morally significant; “God” is responsible for the evolutionary system that placed highly sentient life on a trajectory toward the good, or at least toward tests that offered the opportunity and incentive to realize the good; in the process “God” gave each of us a moral axis around which to organize our lives, should we choose to.
Being human, we will always conceive of the source of this moral order in misleadingly crude ways, but then again you could say the same thing about conceiving electrons. So you’ll do with the source of the moral order what physicists do with a subatomic source of the physical order, such as an electron—try to think about it the best you can, and fail. This, at least, is one modern, scientifically informed argument that could be deployed by the believer in God."
(The Evolution of God by Robert Wright)
- S.
Monday, February 16, 2009
Getting a Brain for the Postmodern Straw Man...
I appreciate the provocative and unapologetically confrontational nature of Peter’s original post! As with others who replied, I immediately recognized the clearest example of who who the author was referring to in his critique of preachers who promote the idea of “a cage-fighting, bodybuilding Jesus” [ie. Mark Driscoll, whose podcast I enjoy despite significant doctrinal and ideological disagreement]…
Rollins direct refutation of such poorly crafted theological posturing is a beautiful thing and I hope we can see more of it in the future. I've run across too many examples in recent years of neo-Reformed Piper disciples spreading some truly toxic rhetoric to characterize the ideas of people like Peter Rollins, Brian McLaren, and Rob Bell [ex. Driscoll's unapologetic use of critical hyperbole in generalizing that McLaren's writings that are both heretical and “destructive to the church.”] I have been waiting for a long time for the the wrongly accused (or perhaps a few of their capable surrogates) to just the type of rebuttal Rollins gave in his blog to push back against the rampant straw man characterizations of postmodern and emergent theological ideas often being peddled in particular corners of the church (ex. Why We’re Not Emergent by DeYoung & Cluck and Becoming Conversant with the Emergent Church by D.A. Carson are some of the worst examples I've run across in recent years].
More of us must be willing to clearly articulate and defend genuine articulations of postmodern/emergent theology compared with the misrepresentations of our ideas by some in the conservative/evangelical/Reformed/fundamentalist camp that has risen up in recent years. The common progressive tendency is to search for the good in an opponent’s arguments and attempt to build a consensus on whatever points of agreement can be found. Unfortunately, the argument with Driscoll and the like are rarely made in good faith and often shift abruptly to a false categorization or misrepresentation of the true nature of the disagreement.
Can anyone actually point to a single example of even the most passionate emergent progressive who would actually describe their beliefs to include the theological caricature of Jesus of Nazareth bearing the slightest resemblance to the effete embarrassment Driscoll usually describes as the limp-wrist, feminine postmodern Jesus with "product in his hair? NO! This is a make-believe sketch Driscoll is projecting upon emergent/postmodern theology that has been created and repeated ad nauseum, despite bearing ZERO resemblance to any objective reality among REAL emergent/postmodern believers. It’s long past the time for more people to characterize such arguments as the misrepresentative mistakes they truly are.
Perhaps we can finally respond with a “Great Rebuttal” to this wave of false witnesses. I've got my finger's crossed!
- S.
Friday, December 19, 2008
Change we can believe in...
Friday, December 12, 2008
Left holding the bag...
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Apocalypse Now and Later...
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
A house of cards on a bed of sand...
"But if you just use my words in Bible studies and don't work them into your life, you are like a stupid carpenter who built his house on the sandy beach. When a storm rolled in and the waves came up, it collapsed like a house of cards. These words I speak to you are not incidental additions to your life, homeowner improvements to your standard of living. They are foundational words, words to build a life on. If you work these words into your life, you are like a smart carpenter who built his house on solid rock. Rain poured down, the river flooded, a tornado hit—but nothing moved that house. It was fixed to the rock."
Matthew 7: 21 -25 [The Message] (paraphrase)
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Waste Not, Want Not...
It happens so regularly that it's predictable. The moment I decide to do good, sin is there to trip me up. I truly delight in God's commands, but it's pretty obvious that not all of me joins in that delight. Parts of me covertly rebel, and just when I least expect it, they take charge.
I've tried everything and nothing helps. I'm at the end of my rope. Is there no one who can do anything for me? Isn't that the real question?
The answer, thank God, is that Jesus Christ can and does. He acted to set things right in this life of contradictions where I want to serve God with all my heart and mind, but am pulled by the influence of sin to do something totally different.
(Romans 7: 20-25) The Message
Selah.
I'm amazed by Paul's honesty in this passage. The man responsible for writing a large portion of the New Testament confesses to facing a crippling spiritual weakness he can't seem to overcome no matter how hard he tries. Paul pulls back the curtain on his own frailty, revealing the universal battle between the light of God and the darkness of sin that exists within every follower of Jesus (myself included).
Paul reminds us that our failures will not have the final word. With love from the Father, grace from the Son, and strength from the Spirit, another outcome is possible. God is the ultimate conservationist, taking the parts of our lives that look like garbage and recycling them into opportunities to distribute his grace and display his glory. Through this miracle of transformation, we can fulfill life's highest calling: to receive mercy for our sins and to share mercy with others. We can finally be free from the same tired old methods of being "Christian".
No more spiritually corrosive distractions used to numb the pain of our unconverted failures. No more vague and formulaic prayers mumbled toward the ceiling that leave us feeling empty and alone. No more force feeding ourselves endless strings of sermons in the hopes of achieving morality by osmosis. No more... no more... no more...
May God help us trust in His power to transform our absolute worst into something great. May God lead us to receive the redemption found in Jesus Christ. May be God be proven true, and every man a liar.
- S.